El conversatorio universitario en Mercurio Peruano. Raúl Porras Barrenechea y Luis Alberto Sánchez, a propósito del centenario (1919-1921)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente trabajo aborda la presencia y la significancia de los jóvenes del conversatorio universitario en las páginas de Mercurio Peruano durante los años 1919-1921. Para ese motivo, se examina el problema desde los siguientes aspectos: el contexto que propició la ciudad de Lima a inicios del siglo XX en la formación del quehacer intelectual para los jóvenes.1 En segundo lugar, se examina la aparición de una publicación periódica de ciencias sociales como el Mercurio Peruano en la trama cultural limeña. En ese sentido, se analiza cómo se forma un espacio intergeneracional para debatir y, también, para observar cómo se adecuan los jóvenes del conversatorio en el mensuario arielista. Finalmente, se busca caracterizar los rasgos distintivos de la iniciativa del conversatorio universitario, a partir de las experiencias particulares y comunes de dos participantes: Raúl Porras Barrenechea y Luis Alberto Sánchez.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".