El conversatorio universitario en Mercurio Peruano. Raúl Porras Barrenechea y Luis Alberto Sánchez, a propósito del centenario (1919-1921)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente trabajo aborda la presencia y la significancia de los jóvenes del conversatorio universitario en las páginas de Mercurio Peruano durante los años 1919-1921. Para ese motivo, se examina el problema desde los siguientes aspectos: el contexto que propició la ciudad de Lima a inicios del siglo XX en la formación del quehacer intelectual para los jóvenes.1 En segundo lugar, se examina la aparición de una publicación periódica de ciencias sociales como el Mercurio Peruano en la trama cultural limeña. En ese sentido, se analiza cómo se forma un espacio intergeneracional para debatir y, también, para observar cómo se adecuan los jóvenes del conversatorio en el mensuario arielista. Finalmente, se busca caracterizar los rasgos distintivos de la iniciativa del conversatorio universitario, a partir de las experiencias particulares y comunes de dos participantes: Raúl Porras Barrenechea y Luis Alberto Sánchez.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".