MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4286560858 · doi:10.1103/physreve.106.015108

Diffusion tensor imaging of anisotropic inhomogeneous turbulent flow

2022· article· en· W4286560858 on OpenAlexafffund
Amy-Rae P. Gauthier, Noah Stocek, Benedict Newling

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. E · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTurbulencePhysicsAnisotropyTensor (intrinsic definition)Diffusion MRIFlow (mathematics)Turbulent diffusionDiffusionClassical mechanicsMechanicsStatistical physicsJet (fluid)Anisotropic diffusionTurbulence modelingOpticsGeometryMathematicsMagnetic resonance imagingQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inhomogeneous anisotropic turbulent flow is difficult to measure, and yet it commonly occurs in nature and in many engineering applications. This work aims to introduce a technique based on magnetic resonance imaging which can spatially map the degree of turbulence as well as the degree of anisotropy. Our interpretation relies on the eddy diffusion model of turbulence, and combines this with the technique of diffusion tensor imaging. The result is an eddy diffusion tensor, which is represented by a symmetric three-by-three matrix. This tensor contains a wealth of information about the magnitude and directions of the turbulent fluctuations; however, the correlation time must be considered before interpreting this information. In the constricted pipe flow used in this study, the turbulence is greatest in magnitude in the space surrounding the core of the turbulent jet, and the turbulence is highly anisotropic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.411
Threshold uncertainty score0.626

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. ESame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207