Growth and design strategies of organic dendritic networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A new paradigm of electronic devices with bio-inspired features is aiming to mimic the brain’s fundamental mechanisms to achieve recognition of very complex patterns and more efficient computational tasks. Networks of electropolymerized dendritic fibers are attracting much interest because of their ability to achieve advanced learning capabilities, form neural networks, and emulate synaptic and plastic processes typical of human neurons. Despite their potential for brain-inspired computation, the roles of the single parameters associated with the growth of the fiber are still unclear, and the intrinsic randomness governing the growth of the dendrites prevents the development of devices with stable and reproducible properties. In this manuscript, we provide a systematic study on the physical parameters influencing the growth, defining cause-effect relationships for direction, symmetry, thickness, and branching of the fibers. We build an electrochemical model of the phenomenon and we validate it in silico using Montecarlo simulations. This work shows the possibility of designing dendritic polymer fibers with controllable physical properties, providing a tool to engineer polymeric networks with desired neuromorphic features.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".