MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Projecting the hydrochemical trajectory of a constructed fen watershed: Implications for long-term wetland function

2022· article· en· W4286567581 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Owen F. Sutton, Jonathan S. Price

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Science of The Total Environment · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaImperial Oil LimitedShell CanadaSuncor Energy Incorporated
KeywordsWatershedEnvironmental sciencePeatHydrology (agriculture)GroundwaterWetlandSurface waterWater tableBorealEcologyEnvironmental engineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surface mining operations for bitumen have fundamentally altered large areas of boreal forest and fen peatland in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region (AOSR) of Alberta, Canada. Pilot projects intended to assess the feasibility of fen construction as a reclamation option have been designed, built, and are currently undergoing monitoring. Initial assessments of ecohydrologic function have been conducted for these systems but offer limited insight into their evolution and likely successional pathway. Thus, this study projects the hydrologic and geochemical behaviour of a constructed fen watershed to understand whether the system will be capable of supporting peatland processes into the future. A numerical groundwater flow and sodium transport model was calibrated and validated with 7 years of hydraulic head, water flux, and water chemistry data. Based on Monte Carlo simulations, the projected fen water table would be stable and remain close to the surface (<15 cm), indicating that the design of the system can generate sufficient water quantity to meet evaporative demand and maintain surface water discharge. However, water quality was more sensitive to climatic variability, which induced a large range in potential sodium concentrations at the fen surface (450–850 mg L−1). Evapoconcentration of salts across the surface of the fen will likely limit moss establishment for decades following construction. Yet stress-thresholds of salt-tolerant vegetation like sedges will not be exceeded. Ultimately, these projections support the original design principles and philosophy that guided the creation of the watershed. Nonetheless, this work indicates that increasing the area of the fen relative to the upland would not have a detrimental impact on the ability of the system to maintain a high water table. This could allow for the proportion of peatlands on the reclamation landscape to reflect the pre-disturbance environment more faithfully.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.330

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Science of The Total Environment→Same topicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology→French-language works237,207→