Multiobjective Data-Driven Production Optimization With a Feedback Mechanism
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Operation recommendations and automation for various industries rely on optimization over the top of the real-time Internet of Things data streams. Such recommendation applications have become imperative for industrial manufacturing, such as petroleum, chemicals, and food processing. We build a novel system of user-in-the-loop multiobjective optimization under the initial uncertainty of the optimization objectives, wherein the uncertainty is iteratively resolved via user feedback. We propose an interactive optimization system wherein both business and operational goals become defined as the optimization processes and where objective selection is incorporated as part of the optimization procedure. We show that such a solution exists during the iteration process if the feasibility space is not empty initially and is constrained by industry operations. Using an oil sands application, we demonstrate this approach and compare modeling results in values, response to business and operational priorities, and interpretability to the weighted sum optimization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it