Abnormal Cerebral Blood Flow and Volumetric Brain Morphometry in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a serious breathing disorder, leading to myocardial infarction, high blood pressure, and stroke. Brain morphological changes have been widely reported in patients with OSA. The pathophysiological mechanisms of cerebral blood flow (CBF) changes associated with OSA are not clear. In this study, 20 patients with OSA and 36 healthy controls (HCs) were recruited, and then pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL) and voxel-based morphometry (VBM) methods were utilized to explore blood perfusion and morphological changes in the patients with OSA. Compared with the HC group, the OSA group showed increased CBF values in the right medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), left precentral gyrus, and right insula and showed decreased CBF values in the right temporal pole (TP) and the right cerebellum_Crus2. Compared with the HC group, the patients with OSA showed decreased gray matter volume (GMV) in the right dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), the right occipital pole, and the vermis. There were no significantly increased GMV brain regions found in patients with OSA. Pearson correlation analysis showed that the reduced GMV in the right DLPFC and the right occipital pole was both positively correlated with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (r = 0.755, p < 0.001; r = 0.686, p = 0.002) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores (r = 0.716, p = 0.001; r = 0.601, p = 0.008), and the reduced GMV in the right occipital pole was negatively correlated with duration of illness (r = −0.497, p = 0.036). Patients with OSA have abnormal blood perfusion metabolism and morphological changes in brain regions including the frontal lobe and the cerebellum and were closely related to abnormal behavior, psychology, and cognitive function, which play an important role in the pathophysiological mechanism of OSA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".