MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4286633079 · doi:10.3389/fphys.2022.937127

The Effect of Acute Intermittent and Continuous Hypoxia on Plasma Circulating ßOHB Levels Under Different Feeding Statuses in Humans

2022· article· en· W4286633079 on OpenAlexafffund
Caroline Marcoux, Renée Morin, Jean‐François Mauger, Pascal Imbeault

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Physiology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsInstitut du Savoir MontfortMontfort HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInstitut du savoir Montfort-Recherche
KeywordsNEFAKetogenesisEndocrinologyInternal medicineHypoxia (environmental)LipolysisInsulinMealAdipose tissueMedicineChemistryKetone bodiesMetabolismOxygen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Acute hypoxia is known to increase circulating nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA) levels. Adipose tissue lipolysis is a major source of NEFA into circulation and insulin suppresses this process when the tissue is insulin sensitive. NEFA can be esterified to triglycerides and/or completely/partially oxidized, the latter leading to ketogenesis in the liver. To our knowledge, the effect of hypoxia on ketogenesis, more specifically ß-hydroxybutyrate (ßOHB) levels, remains unknown in humans. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the effect of acute intermittent and continuous hypoxia on circulating ßOHB levels under different feeding status. Methods: Plasma samples from three different randomized crossover studies were assessed for ßOHB concentrations. In the first study, 14 healthy men (23 ± 3.5 years) were exposed to 6 h of normoxia or intermittent hypoxia (IH-Fed) (15 hypoxic events/hour) following an isocaloric meal. In the second study, 10 healthy men (26 ± 5.6 years) were exposed to 6 h of continuous normobaric hypoxia (CH-Fasted) (FiO2 = 0.12) or normoxia in the fasting state. In the third study (CH-Fed), 9 healthy men (24 ± 4.5 years) were exposed to 6 h of normoxia or CH in a constant prandial state. ßOHB, NEFA and insulin levels were measured during all sessions. Results: In the IH-Fed study, ßOHB and NEFA levels tended to be greater over 6 h of IH (condition × time interaction, ßOHB p = 0.108 and NEFA p = 0.062) compared to normoxia. In the CH-Fasted study, ßOHB and NEFA levels increased over time in both experimental conditions, this effect being greater under CH (condition × time interaction, ßOHB p = 0.070; NEFA p = 0.046). In the CH-Fed study, ßOHB levels slightly increased up to 180 min before falling back to initial concentrations by the end of the protocol in both normoxia and CH (main effect of time, p = 0.062), while NEFA were significantly higher under CH (p = 0.006). Conclusion: Acute normobaric hypoxia exposure tends to increase plasma ßOHB concentrations over time in healthy men. The stimulating effect of hypoxia on plasma ßOHB levels is however attenuated during postprandial and prandial states.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PhysiologySame topicDiet and metabolism studiesFrench-language works237,207