DAFT: A universal module to interweave tabular data and 3D images in CNNs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prior work on Alzheimer's Disease (AD) has demonstrated that convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can leverage the high-dimensional image information for diagnosing patients. Beside such data-driven approaches, many established biomarkers exist and are typically represented as tabular data, such as demographics, genetic alterations, or laboratory measurements from cerebrospinal fluid. However, little research has focused on the effective integration of tabular data into existing CNN architectures to improve patient diagnosis. We introduce the Dynamic Affine Feature Map Transform (DAFT), a general-purpose module for CNNs that incites or represses high-level concepts learned from a 3D image by conditioning feature maps of a convolutional layer on both a patient's image and tabular clinical information. This is achieved by using an auxiliary neural network that outputs a scaling factor and offset to dynamically apply an affine transformation to the feature maps of a convolutional layer. In our experiments on AD diagnosis and time-to-dementia prediction, we show that the DAFT is highly effective in combining 3D image and tabular information by achieving a mean balanced accuracy of 0.622 for diagnosis, and mean c-index of 0.748 for time-to-dementia prediction, thus outperforming all baseline methods. Finally, our extensive ablation study and empirical experiments reveal that the performance improvement due to the DAFT is robust with respect to many design choices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".