MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4286641892 · doi:10.54691/bcpbm.v20i.982

The Impact of Globalization on Food Crises and Endemic Hunger

2022· article· en· W4286641892 on OpenAlexaff
Ziang Qu

Bibliographic record

VenueBCP Business & Management · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural risk and resilience
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobalizationCommodificationScarcityCapitalismCivilizationDevelopment economicsPoliticsFood securityPolitical sciencePolitical economyEconomicsEconomyGeographyMarket economyAgriculture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Globalization has brought about many benefits, from a rise in technological constructs to make life easier and more convenient to a degree of interconnectedness never experienced to this extent among human civilization at any other point in history. Yet, globalization and the commodification of numerous areas of society for the purpose of feeding the capitalist machine have also brought about more social, financial, environmental and cultural crises as well. With the onset of a global pandemic, the numbers of people struggling with hunger have increased significantly. Food crises and endemic hunger have persisted despite unprecedented economic growth in many areas of the world. The impact of globalization on hunger is not exemplified in food scarcity, but rather, is the product of globalized racial capitalism, political policies and the process of cheapening food.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBCP Business & ManagementSame topicAgricultural risk and resilienceFrench-language works237,207