MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4286681251 · doi:10.3138/topia-2021-0044

Letting Madness In: Toward Hospitality without Incarceration

2022· article· en· W4286681251 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Richard Ingram

Bibliographic record

VenueTOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFoucault, Power, and Ethics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHospitalityRealmSanitySociologyPsychoanalysisAestheticsResidencePsychologyPhilosophyLawTourismPolitical sciencePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a setting suffused in madness, two people experiment with topologies of hospitality excluded from Jacques Derrida and Anne Dufourmantelle’s Of Hospitality. The sanity of the host and author, Richard Ingram, is called into question by the nature of the dwelling in which he lives and writes-a residence for people who have been excluded from the realm of reason. Following Bataille, Blanchot, and Foucault, the host and his guest ask what it means to pursue a form of “communication” characterized by what Nietzsche termed “self-overcoming.” This form of communication is precisely the kind rendered impossible in the dialogue between Derrida and Dufourmantelle in Of Hospitality. Part 1 of this article, written by Erin Soros, was published in TOPIA 43 - Carceral Cultures/Carceral Logistics ( https://doi.org/10.3138/topia-43-005 )

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.394
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural StudiesSame topicFoucault, Power, and EthicsFrench-language works237,207