MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4286697329 · doi:10.1111/jrh.12702

Clarifying rural‐urban disparities in alcohol‐related emergency department visits and hospitalizations in Ontario, Canada: A spatial analysis

2022· article· en· W4286697329 on OpenAlexaffabout
Erik Loewen Friesen, Winnie Yu, Emmalin Buajitti, Peter Selby, Laura C. Rosella, Paul Kurdyak

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rural Health · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of TorontoInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRuralityMedicineDemographyEmergency departmentRelative riskEnvironmental healthGeographyRural areaConfidence intervalInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Rates of alcohol-related harm are higher in rural versus urban Canada. This study characterized the spatial distribution and regional determinants of alcohol-related emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations in Ontario to better understand this rural-urban disparity. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional spatial analysis of rates of alcohol-related ED visits and hospitalizations by Ministry of Health subregion (n = 76) in Ontario, Canada between 2016 and 2019. Regional hot- and cold-spots of alcohol-related harm were identified using spatial autocorrelation methods. Rurality was measured as the population weighted geographic remoteness of a subregion. The associations between rurality and rates of alcohol-related ED visits and hospitalizations were evaluated using hierarchical Bayesian spatial regression models. FINDINGS: Rates of alcohol-related ED visits and hospitalizations varied substantially between subregions, with high rates clustering in Northern Ontario. Overall, increasing rurality was associated with higher subregion-level rates of alcohol-related ED visits (males adjusted relative rate [aRR]: 1.67, 95% credible interval [CI]: 1.49-1.87; females aRR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.60-1.98) and hospitalizations (males aRR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.24-1.45; females aRR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.45-1.74). However, after the province was separated into Northern and Southern strata, this association only held in Northern subregions. In contrast, increasing rurality was associated with lower rates of alcohol-related ED visits in Southern subregions (males aRR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.96; females aRR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.81-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: There are regional differences in the association between rurality and alcohol-related health service use. This regional variation should be considered when developing health policies to minimize geographic disparities in alcohol-related harm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rural HealthSame topicSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207