MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

E-090 Intraoperative MRI for endovascular coiling of intracranial aneurysms: a single center experience

2022· article· en· W4286701996 on OpenAlexaff
Yanfa Yan, J Shankar, Z Kaderali, T Chowdhury

Bibliographic record

VenueSNIS 19th annual meeting electronic poster abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSingle CenterMagnetic resonance imagingInterventional magnetic resonance imagingEndovascular coilingAneurysmRadiologySurgeryEndovascular treatment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging system (iMRIS) surgical theatre is a highly integrated operating room with an iMRI designed originally for brain tumor surgery. Its use in neurointerventional procedures, particularly in the setting of endovascular coiling of intracranial aneurysms, have not been discussed in the literature to date. We present our initial experience about the safety and feasibility of intraoperative MRI to assess post operative complications and provide baseline imaging post coiling of intracranial aneurysms. In our early experience, a total of 15 patients underwent intra-operative MRI with MRA to assess post coiling status of the intracranial aneurysm. The iMRI is an advantageous tool which can be integrated into neurointerventional workflow resulting in early post preprocedural feedback and potentially reduced post-operative hospital stay. Disclosures Y. Yan: None. J. Shankar: None. Z. Kaderali: None. T. Chowdhury: None.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSNIS 19th annual meeting electronic poster abstractsSame topicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207