MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4286714348 · doi:10.55937/sut/1570358243

Characterization of the Lorentzian para-Sasakian manifolds admitting a quarter-symmetric non-metric connection

2019· article· en· W4286714348 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sudhakar Kr Chaubey, Uday Chand De

Bibliographic record

VenueSUT Journal of Mathematics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetric connectionConnection (principal bundle)MathematicsQuarter (Canadian coin)Metric (unit)Manifold (fluid mechanics)Pure mathematicsMathematical analysisFundamental theorem of Riemannian geometryRicci curvatureTopology (electrical circuits)CombinatoricsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We set the goal to study the properties of LP-Sasakian manifolds equipped with a quarter-symmetric non-metric connection. It is proved that the LP-Sasakian manifold endowed with a quarter-symmetric non-metric connection is partially Ricci semisymmetric with respect to the quarter-symmetric non-metric connection if and only if it is an η-Einstein manifold. We also study the properties of semisymmetric, Ricci recurrent LP-Sasakian manifolds and η-parallel Ricci tensor with respect to the quarter-symmetric non-metric connection. In the end, the non-trivial example of a 4-dimensional LP-Sasakian manifold with a quarter-symmetric non-metric connection is given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSUT Journal of MathematicsSame topicGeometric Analysis and Curvature FlowsFrench-language works237,207