Orientation dynamics of anisotropic and polydisperse colloidal suspensions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Small-angle light scattering (SALS) is employed to determine in situ microstructural changes of polydisperse colloidal suspensions under capillary flow. Titanium dioxide (rod-like) bundles and kaolinite nanoclay (platelet) flake-like stacks of particles are suspended in a Newtonian fluid to explore the effects of shape anisotropy. Subjecting the systems to a startup test in a flow cell in Stokes's regime, the evolution of the anisotropy factor (AF), and the average orientation angle (χ) of particles vs strain is probed at different averaged Péclet (Pe¯) numbers. Dilute and semi-dilute concentration regimes are explored in a capillary flow. Moving in the vorticity direction, we show significant changes in χ due to the gradient in shear rate in the capillary flow, while no cross-sectional flow migration was exhibited. In these polydisperse colloidal suspensions, two characteristic stages are observed: initial particle alignment and subsequent orientational demixing. Probing the velocity–vorticity (xy) plane, an initial particle alignment in the flow direction at high Pe¯ (> 1) occurs, is demonstrated by an elliptical SALS pattern, and then, an increase in AF is observed due to particles' phase mixing. This behavior is then followed by a breakdown in structure and loss of particle alignment due to orientational demixing. The evolution of the average orientation angle of particles in the xy plane can be clearly observed through these two stages by the help of high-resolution SALS contours. These experimental findings provide novel insights into the flow–microstructure relationship of polydisperse colloidal suspensions for the optimization of many industrial processing schemes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".