Analisis Tingkat Pertumbuhan Bank Syariah di Indonesia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Islamic economy in Indonesia continues to grow rapidly. This growth cannot be separated from the role of many institutions that run with sharia principles, especially Islamic banking. This study has the purpose of analyzing the growth rate of Islamic banks in 2017-2019. The method used is Multiple Linear Regression to determine the growth of Islamic banking in Indonesia. This study uses the variables of assets, third-party funds, profit for the year, and financing. This study uses quarterly time-series data from the first quarter of 2017 to the fourth quarter of 2019 and is obtained from the Islamic Banking Statistics data of the Financial Services Authority. The results of this study, namely the variables of assets, financing, profit for the year, and third-party funds affect the growth rate of Islamic banks in Indonesia. Assets and profits for the year have a significant positive effect, while financing and third-party funds have a negative effect on the growth of Islamic banks in the 2017-2019 period. During that period, the growth of Islamic banks in Indonesia fluctuated but growth in each variable increased.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it