Multi-Object Tracking and Segmentation with a Space-Time Memory Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a method for multi-object tracking and segmentation based on a novel memory-based mechanism to associate tracklets. The proposed tracker, MeNToS, addresses particularly the long-term data association problem, when objects are not observable for long time intervals. Indeed, the recently introduced HOTA metric (High Order Tracking Accuracy), which has a better alignment than the formerly established MOTA (Multiple Object Tracking Accuracy) with the human visual assessment of tracking, has shown that improvements are still needed for data association, despite the recent improvement in object detection. In MeNToS, after creating tracklets using instance segmentation and optical flow, the proposed method relies on a space-time memory network originally developed for one-shot video object segmentation to improve the association of sequence of detections (tracklets) with temporal gaps. We evaluate our tracker on KITTIMOTS and MOTSChallenge and we show the benefit of our data association strategy with the HOTA metric. Additional ablation studies demonstrate that our approach using a space-time memory network gives better and more robust long-term association than those based on a re-identification network. Our project page is at \url{www.mehdimiah.com/mentos+}.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".