Análisis de las tablas y los gráficos estadísticos en libros de texto de Chile y España para la Educación Infantil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este trabajo se analizan las representaciones estadísticas, tabular y gráfica, que están presentes en libros de textos chilenos y españoles para la Educación Infantil. Con este propósito analizamos el tipo de tabla y gráfico estadístico, el nivel de complejidad semiótica, el nivel de lectura, el tipo de tarea que se solicita a los estudiantes, y el contexto en el que se enmarca la actividad. Los resultados muestran que las actividades que hacen uso de tablas y gráficos estadísticos en los libros de Educación Infantil brindan apoyo al desarrollo de nociones de sentido numérico y, a la vez permiten explorar relaciones entre datos en contextos. En estudios futuros será necesario indagar en las ventajas y obstáculos que este tipo de representaciones pueden causar para el desarrollo tanto de la alfabetización estadística como de sentido numérico en estas edades.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.010 | 0.014 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".