MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4286957038 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5926011

D2.3: Business Use Cases for the OneNet

2021· report· en· W4286957038 on OpenAlexafffund
Katerina Drivakou, Thanasis Bachoumis, Anastasis Tzoumpas, Catarina Augusto, Sophia Giovanett, Fernando Domínguez, Matteo Troncia, Leandro Lind, FÁBIO LUÍS LOPES DE OLIVEIRA, Siddhesh Gandhi, Miguel Jose Cruz, Damas Carlos Siva

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBig Data and Digital Economy
Canadian institutionsNetwork for Business Sustainability
FundersAtomic Energy of Canada LimitedEuropean Commission
KeywordsBusinessComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The deliverable presents the respective work been done in Task 2.3 and a set of Business Use cases (BUCs) for all OneNet demonstrators in the four clusters, that will materialize the OneNet products and services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.187

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0560.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.176
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.110 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicBig Data and Digital EconomyFrench-language works237,207