Development of Data-Driven Models to Predict Biogas Production from Spent Mushroom Compost
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, two types of data-driven models were proposed to predict biogas production from anaerobic digestion of spent mushroom compost supplemented with wheat straw as a nutrient source. First, a k-nearest neighbours (k-NN) model (k = 1–10) was constructed. The optimal k value was determined using the cross-validation (CV) method. Second, a support vector machine (SVM) model was developed. The linear, quadratic, cubic, and Gaussian models were examined as kernel functions. The kernel scale was set to 6.93, while the box constraint (C) was optimized using the CV method. Results demonstrated that R2 for the k-NN model (k = 2) was 0.9830 at 35 °C and 0.9957 at 55 °C. The Gaussian-based SVM model (C = 1200) provided an R2 of 0.9973 at 35 °C and 0.9989 at 55 °C, which are slightly better than those achieved by k-NN. The Gaussian-based SVM model produced RMSE of 0.598 at 35 °C and 0.4183 at 55 °C, which are 58.4% and 49.5% smaller, respectively, than those produced by the k-NN. These findings imply that SVM modeling can be considered a robust technique in predicting biogas production from AD processes as they can be implemented without requiring prior knowledge of biogas production kinetics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".