MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4287100725 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5824762

Core evidence elements for generating medication safety evidence for pregnancy using population-based data (D1.2)

2021· report· en· W4287100725 on OpenAlexaff
Christine Damase‐Michel, Keele Wurst

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typereport
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsSmiths Detection (Canada)
FundersHospices Civils de LyonEuropean Commission
KeywordsCore (optical fiber)PopulationComputer scienceMedicineEnvironmental healthTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this deliverable is to select, identify, and establish core evidence elements, as well as lay the foundations and analytical considerations to evaluate medication utilisation and safety in pregnancy. By utilizing population-based data, it will inform healthcare professionals together with their patients and at the same time satisfy the requirements for the possible incorporation in product labels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.170
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.398
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.901

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1700.398
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.006
Bibliometrics0.0160.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0040.007
Research integrity0.0080.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.536
GPT teacher head0.456
Teacher spread0.079 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPregnancy and Medication ImpactFrench-language works237,207