MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4287155123 · doi:10.4000/oeconomia.12457

German Fears in Economic Modelling

2022· article· en· W4287155123 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOEconomia · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Theory and Institutions
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanProtestantismOpposition (politics)World War IINationalismNormativeFaithProtestant work ethicMilitarismSociologyPolitical sciencePositive economicsEconomicsLawHistoryEpistemologyPhilosophyCapitalism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For Expo 58, the first World’s Fair after WWII, Wilhelm Krelle constructed a simulator of the economic circular flow—one of the material manifestations of the distinction between economic goals and the mechanics bringing them about that informed the mentality of many neo-Keynesian economists after WWII. In this article, I present a cultural genealogy of this mentality through the unusual career path of Wilhelm Krelle, a genealogy that reveals a deeply German experience. In contrast to the opposition between economic reasoning and the normative sphere, I show how Krelle’s preference for mechanical economic modelling was nourished by Prussian values of militarism, nationalism, and the Protestant faith.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it