MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4287270453 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.08034

RSS-Based UAV-BS 3-D Mobility Management via Policy Gradient Deep\n Reinforcement Learning

2021· preprint· en· W4287270453 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad G. Khoshkholgh, Halim Yanıkömeroğlu

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRSSReinforcement learningComputer scienceBase stationReal-time computingCluster (spacecraft)Function (biology)Line (geometry)Artificial intelligenceComputer networkOperating systemMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We address the mobility management of an autonomous UAV-mounted base station\n(UAV-BS) that provides communication services to a cluster of users on the\nground while the geographical characteristics (e.g., location and boundary) of\nthe cluster, the geographical locations of the users, and the characteristics\nof the radio environment are unknown. UAVBS solely exploits the received signal\nstrengths (RSS) from the users and accordingly chooses its (continuous) 3-D\nspeed to constructively navigate, i.e., improving the transmitted data rate. To\ncompensate for the lack of a model, we adopt policy gradient deep reinforcement\nlearning. As our approach does not rely on any particular information about the\nusers as well as the radio environment, it is flexible and respects the privacy\nconcerns. Our experiments indicate that despite the minimum available\ninformation the UAV-BS is able to distinguish between high-rise (often\nnon-line-of-sight dominant) and sub-urban (mainly line-of-sight dominant)\nenvironments such that in the former (resp. latter) it tends to reduce (resp.\nincrease) its height and stays close (resp. far) to the cluster. We further\nobserve that the choice of the reward function affects the speed and the\nability of the agent to adhere to the problem constraints without affecting the\ndelivered data rate.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207