Computing hydrodynamic eigenmodes of channel flow with slip—A highly accurate algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The transient start‐up flow solution with slip is a useful tool to verify computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. However, a highly accurate, open‐source black box solution does not seem to be available. Our method provides a fast, automated, and rigorously verified open‐source implementation that can compute the hydrodynamic eigenmodes of a two‐dimensional channel flow beyond the standard floating‐point precision. This allows for a very accurate computation of the corresponding Fourier series solution. We prove that all roots are found in all special cases for the general flow problem with different slip lengths on the channel walls. The numerical results confirm analytically derived asymptotic power laws for the leading hydrodynamic eigenmode and the characteristic timescale in the limiting cases of small and large slip. The code repository including test cases is publicly available (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6806351 ). The Navier slip boundary condition for numerical simulations in OpenFOAM is also publicly available (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7037712 ).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".