MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4287321523 · doi:10.55016/ojs/sppp.v14i1.71731

Agricultural Policy Trends: Did Covid Support for Beef Cattle Producers Hit the Mark?

2021· article· en· W4287321523 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karen Spencer

Bibliographic record

VenueThe School of Public Policy Publications · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural risk and resilience
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)AgricultureBeef cattle2019-20 coronavirus outbreakBusinessSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Agricultural economicsAgricultural scienceEconomicsGeographyEnvironmental scienceBiologyForestryOutbreakVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canadian consumers paid more for beef products in 2020 due to various COVID-19 impacts on the supply chain. Farmers and ranchers producing cattle saw a substantial drop in their revenues, while processors, wholesalers and retailers were the net beneficiaries of the higher prices. With the Federal/Provincial “set-aside” program designed to aid beef producers during this uncertain time, how much support was supplied relative to the economic pain seen, and was it directed to the right parties?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe School of Public Policy PublicationsSame topicAgricultural risk and resilienceFrench-language works237,207