Effets de la pandémie de COVID-19 sur le développement des collectivités : apport des intervenants collectifs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le développement des collectivités est une approche utilisée par les intervenants collectifs afin d’améliorer la qualité et les conditions de vie au sein des collectivités territoriales. Cet article a pour objectif de décrire les effets de la pandémie de la COVID-19 sur l’action collective à partir d’une revue narrative de la littérature internationale, avec un accent sur les publications québécoises. Celle-ci démontre que la pandémie a contribué à la recrudescence des inégalités sociales et des problèmes sociaux, a causé une modification dans l’offre de services des organismes communautaires et a perturbé les pratiques d’action et d’intervention collectives. Finalement, l’apport des intervenants collectifs est analysé par les fonctions et expertises qui leur sont propres, dans la réalisation d’actions collectives dans le contexte de pandémie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".