TEKNIK KOMUNIKASI DAN TEKNIK PEMBELAJARAN ANAK BERKEBUTUHAN KHUSUS PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID 19
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to describe communication techniques and learning techniques for Children with Special Needs during the Covid19 pandemic at KTK BSS Giwangan Yogyakarta. The research used descriptive qualitative research. The qualitative approach was chosen because this study used social interaction to obtain data from natural data sources. The data source of this research is Children with Special Needs (ABK) or Special Needs at KTK BSS Giwangan Yogyakarta in kindergarten and elementary school levels. From this research, it was found that in KTK BSS Giwangan there are three types of children with special needs, namely speech impaired, autism and learning difficulties. Communication techniques used are: 1) Using private learning methods (one teacher one child); 2) Make eye contact with the child you are talking to; 3) Cultivating a sense of empathy in conversation; 4) Discuss specific and clear topics and 5) Be patient in waiting for answers from children. Different learning techniques from other children. The learning technique used is the learning technique used for the speech impaired using the Indonesian Sign Language System (SIBI) and the Indonesian Sign Language (BISINDO). For children with Autism constraints using 1) Modeling; 2) Latent Learning 3) Give positive praise and 4) Divide all activities step by step. Learning Difficulties using 1) Multisensory Method; 2) Linguistic Method and 3) Glass Analysis
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it