Analysis of Factors Affecting Cranial Nerve Function of Patients With Vascular Mild Cognitive Impairment Through Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Under Artificial Intelligence Environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study aimed to explore the risk factors of effects of patients with vascular mild cognitive impairment (VaMCI) through functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). In this study, 62 patients were selected from the department of neurology, admitted to Changzhi People's Hospital from October 1, 2018 to February 1, 2020. Patients with VaMCI were defined as the VaMCI group according to Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), and subjects with normal cognitive function were defined as the normal control (NC) group. All patients underwent fMRI to identify the amplitude low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) and regional homogeneity (ReHo) values, and to analyze their association with VaMCI. The results showed that the VaMCI group had lower scores for Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and their subitems (visual space and execution, recall, attention and computation, and language ability) than NC group, with statistical differences (P < 0.05). In VaMCI group, the brain regions with increased ALFF values were the left temporal lobe, left parietal lobe, right temporal lobe, right parietal lobe, and posterior cingulate gyrus. Of them, the left parietal lobe and right temporal lobe were negatively correlated with the recall score on MMSE scale (r = −0.216, r = −0.132, P < 0.01). In VaMCI group, the brain regions with decreased ReHo values were the left temporal lobe, occipital lobe, and left middle temporal gyrus. Of them, the left temporal lobe and occipital lobe were positively correlated with MoCA score (r = 0.473, r = 0.848, P < 0.01). In conclusion, VaMCI patients have cognitive impairment and abnormally increased spontaneous brain activity, especially in the left parietal lobe and the right temporal lobe. At rest, VaMCI patients show decreased whole-brain ReHo in the left medial temporal lobe and occipital lobe. Hypertension is a high-risk factor for cognitive impairment in VaMCI patients. The study can provide a theoretical basis for early diagnosis of VaMCI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".