An mHealth-Based Health Management Information System Among Health Workers in Volta and Eastern Regions of Ghana: Pre-Post Comparison Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing attention to electronic health management information systems (HMISs) in global health, most African countries still depend on inefficient paper-based systems. Good Neighbors International and Evaluate 4 Health have recently supported the Ghana Health Service on the rollout of a mobile health-based HMIS called the e-Tracker system in 2 regions in Ghana. The e-Tracker is an Android-based tracker capture app that electronically manages maternal and child health (MCH) data. The Ghana Health Service has implemented this new system in Community Health Planning and Services in the 2 regions (Volta and Eastern). OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate changes in health workers' capacity and behavior after using the e-Tracker to deliver MCH services. Specifically, the study assesses the changes in knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of the health workers toward the e-Tracker system by comparing the pre- and postsurvey results. METHODS: The KAP of frontline health workers was measured through self-administered surveys before and after using the e-Tracker system to assess their capacity and behavioral change toward the system. A total of 1124 health workers from the Volta and Eastern regions responded to the pre-post surveys. This study conducted the McNemar chi-square test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for a pre-post comparison analysis. In addition, random-effects ordered logistic regression analysis and random-effects panel analysis were conducted to identify factors associated with KAP level. RESULTS: The pre-post comparison analysis showed significant improvement in health workers' capacity, with higher knowledge and practice levels after using the e-Tracker system. As for knowledge, there was a 9.9%-point increase (from 559/1109, 50.41% to 669/1109, 60.32%) in the proportion of the respondents who were able to generate basic statistics on the number of children born in a random month within 30 minutes. In the practice section, the percentage of respondents who had scheduled clientencounters increased from 91.41% (968/1059) to 97.83% (1036/1059). By contrast, responses to the attitude (acceptability) became less favorable after experiencing the actual system. For instance, 48.53% (544/1121) initially expressed their preferences for an electronic system; however, the proportion decreased to 33.45% (375/1121) after the intervention. Random-effects ordered logistic regression showed that days of overwork were significantly associated with health workers' attitudes toward the e-Tracker system. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides empirical evidence that the e-Tracker system is conducive to enhancing capacity in MCH data management for providing necessary MCH services. However, the change in attitude implies that the users appear to feel less comfortable using the new system. As Ghana plans to scale up the electronic HMIS system using the e-Tracker to the national level, strategies to enhance health workers' attitudes are necessary to sustain this new system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".