Bibliographic record
Abstract
The first lower hybrid current drive experiments in the full tungsten WEST tokamak are reported. Good wave coupling is found at rather low plasma current (q95~4.3) and medium density (ne~3×1019m-3). Reflection coefficient is in agreement with the expectation from the linear theory of coupling. With low reflection coefficients, 5MW was coupled for 2 seconds. High central electron temperature, up to 5keV, is achieved at ne = 3-4×1019m-3. Flat and even hollow profiles of tungsten density are derived from the bolometry diagnostic. The stored thermal energy follows the H96-P scaling law with very slight degradation with density. The current drive efficiency has been assessed in low loop voltage (VL~0.15V) discharges. Low plasma current operation and rather high effective charge (Zeff~3) lead to modest current drive efficiency (η = 0.5-0.65 × 1019 A.W-1m-2). Long pulse operation (~30s) with high LHCD power (PLH=2.7MW) is achieved with stationary parameters, in particular electron and impurity densities, with the upper water-cooled tungsten divertor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".