MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4287685446 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.11310

Why Shouldn't All Charts Be Scatter Plots? Beyond Precision-Driven\n Visualizations

2020· preprint· W4287685446 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Enrico Bertini, Michael Correll, Steven Franconeri

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2020
Typepreprint
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Visualization and Analytics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScatter plotVisualizationComputer sciencePlot (graphics)Variable (mathematics)ChartArgument (complex analysis)Information visualizationVisual analyticsPie chartFormative assessmentPerceptionData visualizationArtificial intelligenceMathematicsStatisticsPsychologyMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A central concept in information visualization research and practice is the\nnotion of visual variable effectiveness, or the perceptual precision at which\nvalues are decoded given visual channels of encoding. Formative work from\nCleveland & McGill has shown that position along a common axis is the most\neffective visual variable for comparing individual values. One natural\nconclusion is that any chart that is not a dot plot or scatterplot is deficient\nand should be avoided. In this paper we refute a caricature of this\n"scatterplots only" argument as a way to call for new perspectives on how\ninformation visualization is researched, taught, and evaluated.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0060.007
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.111 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicData Visualization and AnalyticsFrench-language works237,207