MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4287690242 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.05507

Identification of Time-Varying Transformation Models with Fixed Effects,\n with an Application to Unobserved Heterogeneity in Resource Shares

2020· preprint· en· W4287690242 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Irene Botosaru, Chris Muris, Krishna Pendakur

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsUniversity of BristolVanderbilt University
KeywordsEconometricsTransformation (genetics)Index (typography)EconomicsIdentification (biology)Distribution (mathematics)Panel dataResource (disambiguation)Monotone polygonVariable (mathematics)Fixed effects modelMonotonic functionMathematicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We provide new results showing identification of a large class of fixed-T\npanel models, where the response variable is an unknown, weakly monotone,\ntime-varying transformation of a latent linear index of fixed effects,\nregressors, and an error term drawn from an unknown stationary distribution.\nOur results identify the transformation, the coefficient on regressors, and\nfeatures of the distribution of the fixed effects. We then develop a\nfull-commitment intertemporal collective household model, where the implied\nquantity demand equations are time-varying functions of a linear index. The\nfixed effects in this index equal logged resource shares, defined as the\nfractions of household expenditure enjoyed by each household member. Using\nBangladeshi data, we show that women's resource shares decline with household\nbudgets and that half of the variation in women's resource shares is due to\nunobserved household-level heterogeneity.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.105 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)→Same topicFiscal Policy and Economic Growth→French-language works237,207→