A review on AI-based medical image computing in head and neck surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Head and neck surgery is a fine surgical procedure with a complex anatomical space, difficult operation and high risk. Medical image computing (MIC) that enables accurate and reliable preoperative planning is often needed to reduce the operational difficulty of surgery and to improve patient survival. At present, artificial intelligence, especially deep learning, has become an intense focus of research in MIC. In this study, the application of deep learning-based MIC in head and neck surgery is reviewed. Relevant literature was retrieved on the Web of Science database from January 2015 to May 2022, and some papers were selected for review from mainstream journals and conferences, such as IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Medical Image Analysis, Physics in Medicine and Biology, Medical Physics, MICCAI, etc. Among them, 65 references are on automatic segmentation, 15 references on automatic landmark detection, and eight references on automatic registration. In the elaboration of the review, first, an overview of deep learning in MIC is presented. Then, the application of deep learning methods is systematically summarized according to the clinical needs, and generalized into segmentation, landmark detection and registration of head and neck medical images. In segmentation, it is mainly focused on the automatic segmentation of high-risk organs, head and neck tumors, skull structure and teeth, including the analysis of their advantages, differences and shortcomings. In landmark detection, the focus is mainly on the introduction of landmark detection in cephalometric and craniomaxillofacial images, and the analysis of their advantages and disadvantages. In registration, deep learning networks for multimodal image registration of the head and neck are presented. Finally, their shortcomings and future development directions are systematically discussed. The study aims to serve as a reference and guidance for researchers, engineers or doctors engaged in medical image analysis of head and neck surgery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".