MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Las mutaciones dentro de la constitución política de Colombia de 1991

2020· dissertation· es· W4287731372 on OpenAlex
Laura Paola Pinto García, Aura Janeth Buitrago Pedraza, Rubby Cecilia Duran Maldonado, Sebastián Garcés Restrepo, José Eurípides Parra, Juan Camilo García Vernaza, Andrés Mauricio Vásquez Pérez, Juan Manuel Charría Segura

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicComparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
FundersUnited Nations
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La tesis fue desarrollada ante la necesidad de establecer y determinar cuál es realmente la Constitución Política vigente, a partir de las interpretaciones de la Corte Constitucional. Lo inédito de éste trabajo consiste en identificar las mutaciones que han tenido impacto en los derechos fundamentales y en expresiones que afectan la comunidad jurídica. De lo anterior se concluyó que además de las reformas realizadas por vía de cambios formales como el referendo, y el acto legislativo, la Constitución ha sido también transformada a través de la interpretación realizada por la Corte Constitucional en sus sentencias, que sin cambiar el texto constitucional altera su contenido y alcance de sus disposiciones, encontrando así 15 mutaciones, de las cuales 11 impactan en forma intensa los derechos fundamentales y 4 mutaciones que afectan en forma radical expresiones dentro de la comunidad jurídica.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it