MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Las mutaciones dentro de la constitución política de Colombia de 1991

2020· dissertation· es· W4287731372 on OpenAlexaff
Laura Paola Pinto García, Aura Janeth Buitrago Pedraza, Rubby Cecilia Duran Maldonado, Sebastián Garcés Restrepo, José Eurípides Parra, Juan Camilo García Vernaza, Andrés Mauricio Vásquez Pérez, Juan Manuel Charría Segura

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicComparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
FundersUnited Nations
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La tesis fue desarrollada ante la necesidad de establecer y determinar cuál es realmente la Constitución Política vigente, a partir de las interpretaciones de la Corte Constitucional. Lo inédito de éste trabajo consiste en identificar las mutaciones que han tenido impacto en los derechos fundamentales y en expresiones que afectan la comunidad jurídica. De lo anterior se concluyó que además de las reformas realizadas por vía de cambios formales como el referendo, y el acto legislativo, la Constitución ha sido también transformada a través de la interpretación realizada por la Corte Constitucional en sus sentencias, que sin cambiar el texto constitucional altera su contenido y alcance de sus disposiciones, encontrando así 15 mutaciones, de las cuales 11 impactan en forma intensa los derechos fundamentales y 4 mutaciones que afectan en forma radical expresiones dentro de la comunidad jurídica.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.472
Threshold uncertainty score0.938

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComparative constitutional jurisprudence studiesFrench-language works237,207