MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Aplicaciones tecnológicas como factores de cambio en la regulación del servicio público de transporte individual de pasajeros con vehículos tipo rxi. Caso de estudio : Bogotá

2020· dissertation· es· W4287732563 on OpenAlexaff
Camilo Jaimes Poveda, Matteo Grazzi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAdministrative Law and Governance
Canadian institutionsTransport Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En el presente trabajo observará como desde el año 2011, con el ingreso del App Uber, la prestación del servicio público de transporte individual de pasajeros con vehículos tipo taxi ha sufrido grandes cambios, generando modificaciones en el esquema y el ingreso de nuevos actores quienes tienen la posibilidad de cobrar tarifas sin tener en cuenta lo contemplado en la regulación de estructura de costos y metodología tarifaria. Ejemplo de lo anterior es que, en uso de la plataforma tecnológica tanto vehículos especiales (blancos) como los particulares pueden prestar el servicio que en principio solo podrían hacer los taxis y cobrar una tarifa diferente a la señalada por la autoridad competente. A su vez, el regulador se enfrenta ante un gran desafío consistente en incorporar i

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.279
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdministrative Law and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207