MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4287751494 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.14850

Intra- and Inter-Conduction Band Optical Absorption Processes in\n $\\beta$-Ga$_2$O$_3$

2020· preprint· en· W4287751494 on OpenAlexaff
Arjan Singh, Okan Koksal, Nicholas Tanen, Jonathan P. McCandless, Debdeep Jena, Xing, Hartwin Peelaers, Farhan Rana

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGa2O3 and related materials
Canadian institutionsGrace (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBand gapAbsorption (acoustics)SemiconductorMaterials scienceThermal conductionFree carrier absorptionOptoelectronicsOptical conductivityDirect and indirect band gapsMolecular physicsCondensed matter physicsChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

$\\beta$-Ga$_2$O$_3$ is an ultra-wide bandgap semiconductor and is thus\nexpected to be optically transparent to light of sub-bandgap wavelengths well\ninto the ultraviolet. Contrary to this expectation, it is found here that free\nelectrons in n-doped $\\beta$-Ga$_2$O$_3$ absorb light from the IR to the UV\nwavelength range via intra- and inter-conduction band optical transitions.\nIntra-conduction band absorption occurs via an indirect optical phonon mediated\nprocess with a $1/\\omega^{3}$ dependence in the visible to near-IR wavelength\nrange. This frequency dependence markedly differs from the $1/\\omega^{2}$\ndependence predicted by the Drude model of free-carrier absorption. The\ninter-conduction band absorption between the lowest conduction band and a\nhigher conduction band occurs via a direct optical process at $\\lambda \\sim\n349$ nm (3.55 eV). Steady state and ultrafast optical spectroscopy measurements\nunambiguously identify both these absorption processes and enable quantitative\nmeasurements of the inter-conduction band energy, and the frequency dependence\nof absorption. Whereas the intra-conduction band absorption does not depend on\nlight polarization, inter-conduction band absorption is found to be strongly\npolarization dependent. The experimental observations, in excellent agreement\nwith recent theoretical predictions for $\\beta$-Ga$_2$O$_3$, provide important\nlimits of sub-bandgap transparency for optoelectronics in the deep-UV to\nvisible wavelength range, and are also of importance for high electric field\ntransport effects in this emerging semiconductor.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.127 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicGa2O3 and related materialsFrench-language works237,207