MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4287766314 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.01765

AnalogNet: Convolutional Neural Network Inference on Analog Focal Plane\n Sensor Processors

2020· preprint· W4287766314 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew Z. Wong, Benoît Guillard, Riku Murai, Sajad Saeedi, Paul H. J. Kelly

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2020
Typepreprint
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicCCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMNIST databaseComputer scienceConvolutional neural networkRobustness (evolution)ComputationImage processingComputer hardwareEfficient energy useArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkAlgorithmEngineeringImage (mathematics)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a high-speed, energy-efficient Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)\narchitecture utilising the capabilities of a unique class of devices known as\nanalog Focal Plane Sensor Processors (FPSP), in which the sensor and the\nprocessor are embedded together on the same silicon chip. Unlike traditional\nvision systems, where the sensor array sends collected data to a separate\nprocessor for processing, FPSPs allow data to be processed on the imaging\ndevice itself. This unique architecture enables ultra-fast image processing and\nhigh energy efficiency, at the expense of limited processing resources and\napproximate computations. In this work, we show how to convert standard CNNs to\nFPSP code, and demonstrate a method of training networks to increase their\nrobustness to analog computation errors. Our proposed architecture, coined\nAnalogNet, reaches a testing accuracy of 96.9% on the MNIST handwritten digits\nrecognition task, at a speed of 2260 FPS, for a cost of 0.7 mJ per frame.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.120 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicCCD and CMOS Imaging SensorsFrench-language works237,207