MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4287819386 · doi:10.46298/pspa.14138

The Advance Care Project: A first step for the network towards partnership between patients and health professionals

2020· article· fr· W4287819386 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Philippe Anhorn, Mathilde Chinet, Lila Devaux, Robin Reber, France Nicolas

Bibliographic record

Venue˜Le œPartenariat de soin avec le patient. · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealthcare innovation and challenges
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipHealth professionalsHealth careNursingProcess managementBusinessPublic relationsKnowledge managementMedicinePolitical scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 2017, le Réseau Santé Région Lausanne (RSRL) a commencé à travailler sur le Projet de soins anticipé, inspiré des Niveaux de soins québécois et de l’Advance Care Planning. Après un état des lieux réalisé en 2018, le RSRL a lancé en novembre 2019 un test auprès d’une vingtaine de patient-e-s dans plusieurs milieux de soins. Approuvé par la Commission cantonale d’éthique de la recherche, le projet est conduit en collaboration avec la Chaire de soins palliatifs gériatriques du Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire du Canton de Vaud, Lausanne, soutenu par les trois autres Réseaux du Canton et par la Direction générale de la santé.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜Le œPartenariat de soin avec le patient.Same topicHealthcare innovation and challengesFrench-language works237,207