MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4287831933 · doi:10.7759/cureus.27256

A Case of Septic Portal Vein Thrombosis in a 71-Year-Old Female

2022· article· en· W4287831933 on OpenAlexaff
Juliana S Ali, Renée H Kinden, Jason G. Emsley

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePortal vein thrombosisSeptic shockSepsisThrombusThrombosisEmergency departmentMalignancyPortal veinLiver diseaseIntensive care medicineVeinShock (circulatory)SurgeryRadiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a relatively rare condition that is characterized by partial or complete occlusion of the portal vein. The most common risk factors for developing PVT are a result of a low intra-hepatic vein flow or pro-thrombotic states, including underlying liver disease, coagulopathies, infection, and malignancy. Patients with PVT can present asymptomatically, while others are in profound shock. Clinical manifestations vary based on the location of the thrombus, degree of occlusion, and if it has become infected. Although an uncommon source of sepsis in the emergency department (ED), maintaining a high degree of clinical suspicion for septic PVT is critical as there are additional treatment considerations apart from early antibiotic therapy as in general sepsis. The following case report focuses on a 71-year-old woman with a septic PVT who presented to the ED with fever and hypotension in the absence of known risk factors. Current management guidelines and evidence regarding treatment strategies for septic PVT are also discussed in further detail.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicLiver Disease and TransplantationFrench-language works237,207