Perceptions et réactions d’intervenants québécois face à la dispensation de services sociaux aux jeunes et aux familles en temps de COVID-19
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude qualitative vise à documenter les perceptions et les réactions des intervenants du réseau des services sociaux à l’enfance, jeunesse, famille face aux conséquences de la pandémie de COVID-19. Entre la 3 e et la 4 e vague de la pandémie au Québec, 11 intervenants, incluant deux gestionnaires, ont pris part à des groupes de discussion. Les résultats révèlent qu’ils ont ressenti de la peur, de la colère, de l’anxiété, des sentiments d’impuissance et d’incompétence, des tensions et ont dû faire face à une polarisation des opinions, ainsi que de la surcharge et de l’épuisement. Pour s’adapter à cette situation, ils ont employé diverses stratégies, dont la méditation et le télétravail. Ces résultats permettent de dégager cinq constats qui pourront servir à l’amélioration des pratiques et du bien-être des intervenants dans le contexte de la pandémie et en période post-pandémie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".