Signal Isolation in Full-Duplex Inter-Tower Communication Networks: Field Trials
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Future digital terrestrial television (DTT) systems, such as ATSC 3.0, are evolving to offer users new applications and services. These new applications (e.g., target advertisement, connected cars, 4k/8k video content) require a considerable increase in transmission capacity. In contrast, the current standards and technologies need to improve the offered spectral efficiency rate to adapt to the new use cases. A good alternative is to enable full-duplex communications among the ATSC transmission centers to build a mesh network of transmitters (i.e., Inter-Tower Communication Network or ITCN). The main drawback of this idea is the self-interference (SI) or loopback signal that is generated and added to the received signal. To reduce the impact of the SI, the transmission centers combine different signal isolation and cancellation techniques. This paper focuses on the characterization of the signal power isolation between the transmitted and the received signals under different conditions. In particular, this paper shows the results obtained during a measurement campaign in a real broadcast transmission center. The measurements were carried out following a novel signal isolation measurement methodology, and the results analyze the obtained signal isolation and the time variability of the received signal power. The results show that a minimum isolation value of 69.5 dB can be obtained for the worst evaluated case.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it