Modeling and Analysis of the Hysteresis Behavior of the Tensioner
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The tensioner of the engine front end accessory drive system was taken as a study object, and the mechanical structure and working principle of the automatic tensioner were analyzed. The hysteresis behavior test of tensioner torque-angular displacement was carried out, and the effects of different excitation frequencies and excitation amplitudes on the hysteresis behavior of the tensioner were analyzed. According to the modified Dahl hysteresis model, the model parameters of the tensioner was identified. Based on the identified model parameters, the hysteresis behavior of the tensioner was calculated, and the calculation model accuracy was verified with the tested results. The influence of the hysteresis curve transition area exponent on the tensioner behavior was studied. The dynamic behavior of the engine front end accessory drive system was simulated using the simulation software. The effects of the hysteresis curve transition area exponent on the dynamic behavior of the engine front end accessory drive system were studied under the slow acceleration and the rapid acceleration. The method proposed herein facilitates the predicting the dynamic hysteresis behavior of the tensioner, which has the certain engineering significance for the design and the development of the tensioner and the engine front end accessory drive system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".