MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4287947666 · doi:10.3406/ran.2019.1986

Nouvelles inscriptions de la nécropole de la Robine à Narbonne

2019· article· en· W4287947666 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maria-Luisa Bonsangue, Valérie Bel, Maxime Guillaume

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue archéologique de Narbonnaise · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeological and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFreedmanQuarter (Canadian coin)HomogeneousHierarchyAncient historyArtHistoryHumanitiesArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent epigraphic discoveries in the necropolis of Robine in Narbonne (Narbo Martius), in the east of the city, are a rare example in this location of funerary inscriptions found either in situ or near their initial location. The set of seven epitaphs is composed of small, homogeneous marble plaques that likely decorated small funerary monuments or altars of necropolis. This unpublished finding dates to between the second quarter of the 1st century and the end of the 2nd century A. D. It shows the use of the necropolis by plebeians of differing legal status and social levels (from seruus to libertus, including the freedman of a freedman and Augustalis), some of whom were likely to have prospered given the riches of the area surrounding Narbonne. In addition, the discovery sheds new light on knowledge of the plebs in Narbonne in the second century, showing that at the time, a group of individuals with unknown sources of wealth were able to acquire beautiful marble funerary plates, buy slaves and thus attain significant standing in the plebeian hierarchy of the city.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue archéologique de NarbonnaiseSame topicArchaeological and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207