MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4287971464 · doi:10.4000/criminocorpus.7678

Jean-Claude Farcy (1945-2020) et l’histoire contemporaine de la justice

2022· article· fr· W4287971464 on OpenAlexaff
Frédéric Chauvaud, Marc Renneville

Bibliographic record

VenueCriminocorpus revue hypermédia · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedieval and Early Modern Justice
Canadian institutionsCegep de Saint Jerome
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtArt historySociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

« Il y a dans les archives judiciaires une foule de renseignements sur le décor quotidien de la vie, les paroles, les mentalités et les gestes des pauvres qui ne laissent pas de mémoires. En ce sens elles constituent des bribes de mémoire provoqués. » Jean-Claude Farcy (1945-2020) a été un grand historien, il lègue une œuvre scientifique qui se distingue par son ampleur, sa rigueur méthodologique, le défrichage de nouveaux terrains et la mise au point de nombreux instruments de recherche mis ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.136

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.010
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCriminocorpus revue hypermédiaSame topicMedieval and Early Modern JusticeFrench-language works237,207