On the origin of the LIGO "mystery" noise and the high energy particle\n physics desert
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the most ubiquitous features of quantum theories is the existence of\nzero-point fluctuations in their ground states. For massive quantum fields,\nthese fluctuations decouple from infrared observables in ordinary field\ntheories. However, there is no "decoupling theorem" in Quantum Gravity, and we\nrecently showed that the vacuum stress fluctuations of massive quantum fields\nsource a red spectrum of metric fluctuations given by $\\sim$ mass$^5$/frequency\nin Planck units. I show that this signal is consistent with the reported\nunattributed persistent noise, or "mystery" noise, in the Laser Interferometer\nGravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO), for the Standard Model of Particle\nPhysics. If this interpretation is correct, then it implies that: 1) This will\nbe a fundamental irreducible noise for all gravitational wave interferometers,\nand 2) There is no fundamental weakly-coupled massive particle heavier than\nthose in the Standard Model.\n
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".