MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4288033561 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.170434

Development of Penyengat Island Area as an International Tourism Area Based on Heritage Tourism

2022· article· en· W4288033561 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Syafrinaldi, Dhani Akbar, Nurman Nurman Nurman, Dian Venita Sary

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunity-based Tourism Development and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismCultural heritageGeographyHeritage tourismNatural heritageUrbanizationIndustrial heritageValue (mathematics)Tourism geographyCultural heritage managementEconomyRegional scienceEconomic growthArchaeologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research aims to implement the Penyengat Island area as a heritage-based international tourism area. Indonesia is well known as one of the largest numbers of historical tourisms in the world. The number of world tourism heritage sites continues to increase every day, Indonesia has diversity island that one of them has potential to developed as a tourism destination. Penyegat Island is one of potential island due the preservation of customs and moral values that have a historical heritage in Penyengat Island can be promoted by procedures based on international heritage. This paper uses descriptive qualitative methods with data collection techniques through library research with an empirical study approach. The results showed that the phenomenon of urbanization associated with globalization factors make the natural physical structure in the Penyengat Island area less noticed, even though Penyengat Island is a typical area because it has sublime value and culture that can be used as a unique tourism object or destination without eliminating historical value so that Penyengat Island can become one of Indonesia's flagship tourism products in Internasional community based on Heritage Tourism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicCommunity-based Tourism Development and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207