Development of Penyengat Island Area as an International Tourism Area Based on Heritage Tourism
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research aims to implement the Penyengat Island area as a heritage-based international tourism area. Indonesia is well known as one of the largest numbers of historical tourisms in the world. The number of world tourism heritage sites continues to increase every day, Indonesia has diversity island that one of them has potential to developed as a tourism destination. Penyegat Island is one of potential island due the preservation of customs and moral values that have a historical heritage in Penyengat Island can be promoted by procedures based on international heritage. This paper uses descriptive qualitative methods with data collection techniques through library research with an empirical study approach. The results showed that the phenomenon of urbanization associated with globalization factors make the natural physical structure in the Penyengat Island area less noticed, even though Penyengat Island is a typical area because it has sublime value and culture that can be used as a unique tourism object or destination without eliminating historical value so that Penyengat Island can become one of Indonesia's flagship tourism products in Internasional community based on Heritage Tourism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it