Geology, geochemistry, and apatite/titanite U–Pb geochronology of ca. 1.88 Ga alkaline ultrabasic dykes in the Southern Province near Sudbury, Ontario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The area northeast of Sudbury, Ontario, is well known for hosting one of the largest unexplained geophysical anomalies in the Canadian Shield, the Temagami Anomaly. In search of a geological explanation for this anomaly, low-grade metamorphic ultrabasic dykes have been discovered in the overlying Huronian Supergroup sedimentary rocks, both in outcrop and in a deep drill core. Here, we report on the first geochemical and geochronological data obtained on these dykes and compare these data with known magmatic units in and around the 1850 Ma impact-generated Sudbury Igneous Complex (SIC). The NW-striking dykes, which cut across sedimentary rocks of the ca. 2.3 Ga Cobalt Group, and which are, in turn, crosscut by pseudotachylitic breccia, are characterized by distinctively high concentrations of Ti, P, Nb, and Zr, highly fractionated rare earth element patterns (La/YbN 7.6–15.5), and a lack of crustal contamination (Nb/Th > 10). Such features are typical of modern ocean island basalts but very different from Palaeoproterozoic rocks previously documented in the wider region. Multigrain U–Pb laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry analyses performed on magmatic titanite and apatite with high Th/U ratios yielded 1876.0 ± 8.7 and 1880.9 ± 8.3 Ma, respectively, which we interpret as the intrusion age of the dykes. This interpretation is supported by similar whole-rock Sm-Nd model ages of 1890–2000 Ma (initial εNd +2.5). This magmatic event in the footwall of the SIC shortly before the impact was coeval with, and likely genetically related to, the 1.88–1.87 Ga Circum-Superior Large Igneous Province.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".