<i>Aeromonas salmonicida</i> intraspecies divergence revealed by the various strategies displayed when grazed by <i>Tetrahymena pyriformis</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Worldwide, Aeromonas salmonicida is a major bacterial pathogen of fish in both marine and freshwater environments. Despite psychrophilic growth being common for this species, the number of characterized mesophilic strains is increasing. Thus, this species may serve as a model for the study of intraspecies lifestyle diversity. Although bacteria are preyed upon by protozoan predators, their interaction inside or outside the phagocytic pathway of the predator can provide several advantages to the bacteria. To correlate intraspecies diversity with predation outcome, we studied the fate of psychrophilic and mesophilic strains of A. salmonicida cocultured with the ciliate Tetrahymena pyriformis. A total of three types of outcome were observed: digestion, resistance to phagocytosis, and pathogenicity. The psychrophilic strains are fully digested by the ciliate. In contrast, the mesophilic A. salmonicida subsp. pectinolytica strain is pathogenic to the ciliate. All the other mesophilic strains display mechanisms to resist phagocytosis and/or digestion, which allow them to survive ciliate predation. In some cases, passage through the phagocytic pathway resulted in a few mesophilic A. salmonicida being packaged inside fecal pellets. This study sheds light on the great phenotypic diversity observed in the complex range of mechanisms used by A. salmonicida to confront a predator.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".