Extended Bayesian endemic–epidemic models to incorporate mobility data into COVID‐19 forecasting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Forecasting the number of daily COVID-19 cases is critical in the short-term planning of hospital and other public resources. One potentially important piece of information for forecasting COVID-19 cases is mobile device location data that measure the amount of time an individual spends at home. Endemic-epidemic (EE) time series models are recently proposed autoregressive models where the current mean case count is modelled as a weighted average of past case counts multiplied by an autoregressive rate, plus an endemic component. We extend EE models to include a distributed-lag model in order to investigate the association between mobility and the number of reported COVID-19 cases; we additionally include a weekly first-order random walk to capture additional temporal variation. Further, we introduce a shifted negative binomial weighting scheme for the past counts that is more flexible than previously proposed weighting schemes. We perform inference under a Bayesian framework to incorporate parameter uncertainty into model forecasts. We illustrate our methods using data from four US counties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.044 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".