MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4288053039 · doi:10.47456/geo.v1i34.37893

Evangélicos e o dispositivo urbano neoliberal

2022· article· pt· W4288053039 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeografares · 2022
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion and Society in Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo apresenta os resultados parciais de uma pesquisa de doutorado em andamento sobre as relações entre as igrejas evangélicas das favelas e periferias da cidade do Rio de Janeiro e o neoliberalismo. O objetivo é conhecer o papel desempenhado por estas igrejas na governamentalidade neoliberal. Para tanto, a religião é interpretada como um fenômeno de legitimação do poder (Durkheim, Berger, Bourdieu e Weber) e o neoliberalismo como uma forma de governo dos indivíduos (Foucault e Dardot e Laval). O artigo utiliza-se ainda de alguns dados preliminares de uma etnografia que venho conduzindo na cidade do Rio de Janeiro e de dados secundários provenientes de outras publicações. Os resultados parciais indicam que algumas igrejas evangélicas são parte de um conjunto heterogêneo e articulado de governamentalidades que tenho chamado de dispositivo urbano neoliberal e que inclui modos de subjetivação, militarização, remoção de favelas, tráfico de drogas e milícias.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.338
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it