MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4288063407 · doi:10.1097/ta.0000000000003394

Timing of tracheostomy in acute traumatic spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021· review· en· W4288063407 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sarah J Foran, Shaurya Taran, Jeffrey M. Singh, Demetrios J. Kutsogiannis, Victoria McCredie

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTracheal and airway disorders
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of AlbertaCanada Research ChairsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineConfidence intervalSpinal cord injuryMechanical ventilationIntensive care unitMeta-analysisObservational studyIntubationAnesthesiaInternal medicineSpinal cord

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND Patients with acute traumatic cervical or high thoracic level spinal cord injury (SCI) typically require mechanical ventilation (MV) during their acute admission. Placement of a tracheostomy is preferred when prolonged weaning from MV is anticipated. However, the optimal timing of tracheostomy placement in patients with acute traumatic SCI remains uncertain. We systematically reviewed the literature to determine the effects of early versus late tracheostomy or prolonged intubation in patients with acute traumatic SCI on important clinical outcomes. METHODS Six databases were searched from their inception to January 2020. Conference abstracts from relevant proceedings and the gray literature were searched to identify additional studies. Data were obtained by two independent reviewers to ensure accuracy and completeness. The quality of observational studies was evaluated using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. RESULTS Seventeen studies (2,804 patients) met selection criteria, 14 of which were published after 2009. Meta-analysis showed that early tracheostomy was not associated with decreased short-term mortality (risk ratio [RR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39–1.79; p = 0.65; n = 2,072), but was associated with a reduction in MV duration (mean difference [MD], 13.1 days; 95% CI, –6.70 to –21.11; p = 0.0002; n = 855), intensive care unit length of stay (MD, –10.20 days; 95% CI, –4.66 to –15.74; p = 0.0003; n = 855), and hospital length of stay (MD, –7.39 days; 95% CI, –3.74 to –11.03; p < 0.0001; n = 423). Early tracheostomy was also associated with a decreased incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia and tracheostomy-related complications (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75–0.98; p = 0.02; n = 2,043 and RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48–0.84; p = 0.001; n = 812 respectively). The majority of studies ranked as good methodologic quality on the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. CONCLUSION Early tracheostomy in patients with acute traumatic SCI may reduce duration of mechanical entilation, length of intensive care unit stay, and length of hospital stay. Current studies highlight the lack of high-level evidence to guide the optimal timing of tracheostomy in acute traumatic SCI. Future research should seek to understand whether early tracheostomy improves patient comfort, decreases duration of sedation, and improves long-term outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Systematic Review, level III.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical CareSame topicTracheal and airway disordersFrench-language works237,207